1/ Theories and definitions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13131/2611-657X.whatever.v4i1.147

Keywords:

thanatology, death studies, queer theory, mourning, grief

Abstract

This is part 1 of 6 of the dossier What Do We Talk about when We Talk about Queer Death?, edited by M. Petricola. The contributions collected in this article sit at the crossroads between thanatology and queer theory and tackle questions such as: how can we define queer death studies as a research field? How can queer death studies problematize and rethink the life-death binary? Which notions and hermeneutic tools could be borrowed from other disciplines in order to better define queer death studies?
The present article includes the following contributions: – MacCormack P., What does queer death studies mean?; – Radomska M., On queering death studies; – Lykke N., Death as vibrancy; – Hillerup Hansen I., What concreteness will do to resolve the uncertain; – Olson P., Queer objectivity as a response to denials of death; – Manganas N., The queer lack of a chthonic instinct.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-29

How to Cite

MacCormack, P. ., Radomska, M., Lykke, N., Illerup Hansen, I., Olson, P. R., & Manganas, N. (2021). 1/ Theories and definitions. Whatever. A Transdisciplinary Journal of Queer Theories and Studies, 4(1), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.13131/2611-657X.whatever.v4i1.147

Issue

Section

Dossier. What do we talk about when we talk about queer death?